Archive for the 'anti-malware comparative testing' Category
Even as AMTSO attempts to bring some qualified and competent guidance to testing methodologies, and individuals with an agenda or paranoia invent stories about why it is not good, we see more completely incompetent testing.
I refer this time to the test that Steve Ragan wrote about at http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201031/5979/Anti-Virus-industry-lacking-when-it-comes-to-detection-says-report. The test performed by Cyveillance, who describe … Read More…
I may have mentioned the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization here before.
ESET is an enthusiastic supporter of this initiative, and several members of the research and lab teams attended the meeting at the beginning of this week in Cupertino.
Lots of interesting and stimulating discussion took place. The Review of Reviews Board (or Review Analysis Board), … Read More…
You may have noticed that I’ve been making a lot of references to this over the past few weeks. You can now download it here. Quite a few people have worked pretty hard to make this project happen, and I’d like to thank them now. I hope some of you will find it interesting and … Read More…
- David Harley (770)
- Randy Abrams (437)
- Cameron Camp (102)
- ESET Research (61)
- Pierre-Marc Bureau (50)
- Stephen Cobb (47)
- Aryeh Goretsky (30)
- Paul Laudanski (17)
- Jeff Debrosse (14)
- Andrew Lee (14)
- Robert Lipovsky (10)
- Sebastian Bortnik (9)
- Dan Clark (8)
- Sébastien Duquette (5)
- Tasneem Patanwala (3)
- Peter Stancik (2)
- Andrea Kokavcova (1)
- David Carnevale (1)
- C. Nicholas Burnett (1)

