http://blog.eset.com/2008/10/27/an-introduction-to-packers Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:29:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blog.eset.com/2008/10/27/an-introduction-to-packers/comment-page-1#comment-82604 gettox Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:15:25 +0000 http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=161#comment-82604 Nice! but look that at  the end, this still meaning that we'll be suspecting in any message that our anti-virus tell us when a run-time packer is running or is unpacking, so gonna be a bother for the users in some way, but thanks so much for the explanation Mr Abrams. Nice! but look that at  the end, this still meaning that we'll be suspecting in any message that our anti-virus tell us when a run-time packer is running or is unpacking, so gonna be a bother for the users in some way, but thanks so much for the explanation Mr Abrams.

]]> http://blog.eset.com/2008/10/27/an-introduction-to-packers/comment-page-1#comment-75344 Randy Abrams Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:51:49 +0000 http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=161#comment-75344 Personally I enable runtime packer protection. The impact is that it slows the system down a bit when scanning a runtime packed file. It takes cpu cycles to do the unpacking on the fly. Try enabling it. If you don't notice a difference or the difference is acceptable then you've increased your security. There's always a trade of between security and usability and yo'll have to decide for yourself if the cost is reaonable. Personally I enable runtime packer protection. The impact is that it slows the system down a bit when scanning a runtime packed file. It takes cpu cycles to do the unpacking on the fly. Try enabling it. If you don’t notice a difference or the difference is acceptable then you’ve increased your security. There’s always a trade of between security and usability and yo’ll have to decide for yourself if the cost is reaonable.

]]> http://blog.eset.com/2008/10/27/an-introduction-to-packers/comment-page-1#comment-75340 Don Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:07:32 +0000 http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=161#comment-75340 i am using version 4 i am using version 4

]]> http://blog.eset.com/2008/10/27/an-introduction-to-packers/comment-page-1#comment-75338 Don Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:05:46 +0000 http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=161#comment-75338 why doesnt nod32 use runtime packer protection as default. should i activate it and how will it adversely affect my system? why doesnt nod32 use runtime packer protection as default. should i activate it and how will it adversely affect my system?

]]> http://blog.eset.com/2008/10/27/an-introduction-to-packers/comment-page-1#comment-48541 otoman Fri, 22 May 2009 11:24:24 +0000 http://www.eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=161#comment-48541 i love this blog and topic. if you go little bit deeper and technical it wll be mind blowing. Plz keep posting. Thank you very much Otoman i love this blog and topic. if you go little bit deeper and technical it wll be mind blowing. Plz keep posting.
Thank you very much
Otoman

]]>